Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shain Neumeier (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator‎. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 22:04, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shain Neumeier

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hello,

I was looking up information about them, but couldn't find many in-depth sources about them. I looked through the history, and saw that there were far more sources, most of which were added by one or two people. However, many of these sources didn't mention them much. A lot of other sources were self-published. I hope that their article can stay, but I don't know. What do you think? 2620:8D:8000:1040:AD0E:F45F:9F64:727F (talk) 20:51, 6 June 2023 (UTC) ported over from Talk:Shain Neumeier by Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:35, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Sexuality and gender, and California. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:35, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator I now see that there are quite a few sources that can't be found directly by search. Shain has done good work for sure. 66.152.106.10 (talk) 22:02, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I think they pass

WP:BASIC due to the extensive commentary on their work here: Blanck, P., Hyseni, F., & Wise, F. A. (2021). Diversity and inclusion in the american legal profession: Discrimination and bias reported by lawyers with disabilities and lawyers who identify as LGBTQ+. American Journal of Law and Medicine, 47(1), 9-61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/amj.2021.1

Combined with all the other sources, this is enough. Neumeier seems to be an expert in the field of human rights, and this article is overall a net positive to the encyclopaedia.

I added some content to the article since it was nominated, before sharing this perspective. CT55555(talk) 19:13, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:14, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: Based on current state of the article and the past 2 discussions. I suspect the IP nom is a sock of the blocked nom from the previous AFDs. UtherSRG (talk) 19:14, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:15, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.