Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharon Kane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 11:13, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sharon Kane

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable former pornographic actress. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 11:08, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 11:09, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 11:10, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Ridiculous nomination. Kane was one of the longest active and prolific female performers in porn (30+ years) probably only behind
GoldenAgeFan1 (talk) 14:40, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Can you provide some links to these sources? For books, ISBN and page number would be of help. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 20:37, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi. The Morning Olympian newspaper article is already cited in article. The books Wonder Bread and Ecstasy and Coming Attractions: The Making of an X-Rated Movie are both on Google Books, but unfortunately only give limited previews. Searching "Sharon", "Kane", and "Sharon Kane" can show some excepts from some of the pages related to her. 1, 2
  GoldenAgeFan1 (talk) 00:47, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:39, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:40, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:40, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:40, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:40, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable pornographic performer lacking the level of indepdent, 3rd party secondary source in-depth independent coverage needed to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:19, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment John Pack Lambert I just provided three of those earlier in the AFD. Would you mind giving your analysis on why those three sources aren't good enough? Thank you.
GoldenAgeFan1 (talk) 00:35, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep - I believe she passes the GNG after reviewing Google Books.[1][2][3][4] I also believe she passes
WP:CREATIVE as a director/producer in gay porn, given her GAYVN Trailblazer award and The Advocate noting her as an "adult entertainment legend".[5] Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:27, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep. Per
WP:NACTOR given her number of films (#1), following (#2), and inductee into the hall of fame of the most important body in the industry, AVN (#3). Britishfinance (talk) 15:21, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.