Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaukat Mahmood Basra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:55, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shaukat Mahmood Basra

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

New, unreviewed, creation by a now-blocked spammer Macrolancer (talk · contribs) / Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IMZahidIqbal who is churning out biogs in what's an obvious paid editing scheme. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:55, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:17, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:17, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andy Dingley, I accepting I made some citation which is not suitable to Wikipedia. Get punished for 72 hours and learned a lot to never use such sites as the citation in Wikipedia. Will not do that again. There is no issue with this article. You can check the notability and verify references. Macrolancer (talk) 08:22, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't about citations, it's about your use of multiple

WP:SOCKPUPPET accounts. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:41, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi

WP:SOCKPUPPET? Macrolancer (talk) 11:12, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep and flag for a neutrality check.
WP:NPOL on that basis, that's the situation we have here. Bearcat (talk) 17:27, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:40, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Has been an elected member of the Parliament so meets basic notability, however few sources cited are unreliable. --Saqib (talk) 20:47, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Verifiable Member of Provincial Assembly passes
WP:POLITICIAN. Passable stub in its current state. • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.