Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shazia Wajahat (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

(non-admin closure) Femke (talk) 19:13, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Shazia Wajahat

Shazia Wajahat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

TV producer. Fails WP:GNG, no independent, significant coverage. She did not, in fact, win a Hum Award, the film did. Producer, even of notable productions, is not notable. Sourcing is iffy, notability is not inherited from husband. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:43, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • DELETE and SALT as the page recreated after first AFD delete, and for using fake misleading citation in "She has won Hum Award for Best Television Film for producing Main Kukkoo Aur Woh." The citation of DAWN, is fake misleading. - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 11:19, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:08, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:44, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • KEEP Above-mentioned reference from Dawn (newspaper) is CERTAINLY not fake!!! Images website is part of
    Dawn Group of Newspapers for sure. I have been using references here on Wikipedia from Dawn newspaper since 2012. It may be confusing, I admit, but if one looks closely at the URL PATH ... https://images.dawn.com , it definitely contains the name of the Dawn newspaper in it and the other reference from Dawn newspaper is also legitimate. The article already has plenty of newspaper references. Regards Ngrewal1 (talk) 19:07, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    Comment: Does this https://www.dawn.com/news/1175086 page even have a single word about the subject person? Show us. - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 13:34, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
COMMENT But first what about you making a baseless sweeping statement above about both of them being FAKE Dawn newspaper websites? Where did you get that? Let's get real here, this is an encyclopedia and let's both focus on the above article's merits. If one of the 10 references added by the original editors (I personally have never edited this article) is not specific enough, that one reference can be very easily taken out and this article trimmed down. All I am hoping and expecting here on this AfD forum is that this article be given fair consideration per Wikipedia guidelines and policy...Thanks Ngrewal1 (talk) 16:35, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ngrewal1 I said the citation is fake misleading, not DAWN is fake. Kindly get the point. - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 04:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – 333-blue at 06:11, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Highly recognised woman producer in Pakistan (eg features on panel of leading Pakistani film industry representatives, producer of one of the leading series of 2021). Plaintiff in the May 2022 Sindh High Court decision requiring 85% of screening time to be devoted to Pakistani films. FWIW the citation above is not fake, although it's understandable that only a precursory glance would lead one to think it might be. The linked article includes: "Best Telefilm: Main Cuckoo Aur Woh by Showcase Communication" ... Showcase Communication being Shazia Wajahat's production company. No doubt more even material available in Urdu. Passes the GNG. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 11:21, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment All three refs passed mention only. That doesn't satisfy the
    WP:ANYBIO. - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 06:02, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please back your vote with the policies
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 18:22, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.