Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shehab Khan

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete - the argument regarding SIGCOV, mentioned in the nomination and detailed by TimothyBlue, was not addressed in response. Daniel (talk) 03:00, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shehab Khan

Shehab Khan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the awards are major. Some are just nominations. Most of the references are by him, not about him DGG ( talk ) 10:30, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:31, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:31, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, he is a notable personality and wide media coverage suggests he meets the notability criteria and is worthy of notice. The sources are biographies and don't appear to be by him but by organizations which are considered reliable sources. Some of the awards are nominations but others seem to be successful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.169.221.235 (talk) 11:44, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 14:44, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: The awards give notability as do some of the articles, and his media presence. He is a up-and-coming UK media presence who has uncovered some national issues. --Whiteguru (talk) 09:36, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:13, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This might be
    WP:CRYSTAL
    applies. I could find mentions but nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.
Source Eval Table
Source Evaluation
School, Chigwell. "Biography, Chigwell… 404. Bio appears to be from school subject attended
Social media and European politics :… Subject receives mention on pp. 158 about a tweet that was viewed as part of an "influential cluster", but it is not indepth coverage of the subject but an evaluation of the tweet.
"Journalist from The Independent wins… This would be SIGCOV, but the subject is / was affliated with the newspaper.
Begum, Shelina (26 October 2017). "As… One sentence mention of the subject winning an award, not SIGCOV
"Shehab Khan". The Independent. Retri… Subject's name is at the top of a page with no content about the subject. No SIGCOV
"National Press Awards Shortlist – So… Subject's name appears on a list of nominees, No SIGCOV
"Shehab Khan". ITV News. Retrieved 22… Single paragraph writers bio on a site the subject writes for. No SIGCOV
"Shehab Khan". IMDb. Retrieved 23 Apr… Single paragraph bio on IMDB written by a "SK". Not SIGCOV
Cooper, Charlie (18 February 2020). "… Name appers in link text pointing to an article written by the subject. No SIGCOV
. Newsroom, The (7 July 2020). "Awards… Subject mentioned in one sentence with another winner. No SIGCOV
. Dickson, Annabelle (21 February 2020… Subject is mentioned as an interviewer. No SIGCOV
BLP articles should strictly follow
WP:N sourcing requirements. Hopefully this is TOOSOON, but at the present this article lacks SIGCOV. If anyone finds SIGCOV, please ping me and I'll be glad to switch to keep.  // Timothy :: t | c | a   09:31, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.