Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shelly Grabe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Shelly Grabe

Shelly Grabe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article about a professor from the University of California, Santa Cruz that is not remotely notable outside any of her papers and research publications. From doing several searches online, all I get are links to her works, but nothing completely about the individual. I don't see the notability even under academic guidlines. Not a single inline source is used to verify the information on the article about the subject. This fails GNG on a basic level. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:42, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:37, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:38, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 22:40, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Now a full professor: [1]. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 22:42, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Passes
  WP:Prof#C1 on basis of GS citations. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:04, 3 January 2022 (UTC).[reply
  ]
• Keep It does pass
  WP:Prof#C1 . --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 18:34, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep. I can't find reviews of her books for
  WP:PROF#C1 notability is clear enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:26, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep. Passes
  WP:PROF#C1 per citations. ExRat (talk) 00:39, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep passes
  WP:PROF#C1.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:01, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep Slam-dunk. (I don't normally vote keep) per the snow
  WP:PROF keepers. -Roxy the dog. wooF 08:53, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep. As noted, clearly passes
  WP:PROF#C1Deathlibrarian (talk) 09:25, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep As already said, meets
  WP:NPROF. -Kj cheetham (talk) 15:19, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Comment Since the Afd, the article now meets the notability requirements. We can close this as keep. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:44, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.