Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherbourne Street

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:35, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sherbourne Street

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence shown that this is a notable settlement. The article Boxford, Suffolk suggests that it is part of Boxford. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 10:19, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. —Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 10:29, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable address. This is a street in a Suffolk village. Streets need to be very notable to get their own article. Nancy ^talk 18:32, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom and per Nancy. Although the guidelines at
WP:UKCITIES are fairly liberal as to what constitutes a settlement, it does not mean a road between group of farm buildings. This may not be a paper encyclopedia but there is a limit to what it should contain and what people are likely to look up. --Kudpung (talk) 10:11, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment. I have no opinion on the article, but the place is labeled as a settlement on Ordnance Survey maps, so it appears to be more than just a street. Deor (talk) 23:37, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.