Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shit You Weren't Supposed To Hear

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:26, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shit You Weren't Supposed To Hear

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's absolutely no notably given on the article. When doing a quick search on Google, nothing but blogs pop up. Devin (talk) 23:05, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Speedy procedural close~~. No reason given for deletion. Dricherby (talk) 23:33, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Reason now given. Thought giving a reason was optional. Devin (talk) 00:37, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Stage II of
    WP:BEFORE says that you should search for additional sources and it's best to do more than a "quick Google search". Dricherby (talk) 08:18, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Delete. No notability found with general Google search or Google news. As per nom, searching seems to give entirely blogs, download sites and the artist's own social media presence. Dricherby (talk) 08:18, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or merge selectively to artist's article--might be worth a line or two there. As above, I found mentions only on some fan sites. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 15:36, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.