Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shoe City

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 18:01, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shoe City

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Cannot really be termed ntable according to
WP:CORP. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 01:31, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete It was listed for speedy deletetion, and the speedy tag was removed by another admin, with the explanation "removed speedy, removed promotional content, cleaned up; this company appears notable per [1]" . I do not think that's a good search-- the references that link turn up are almost all non-specific--the name is not at all uncommon & it also k=gets various phrases. For the one in the article, there's nothing but utterly routine local announcements DGG ( talk ) 19:15, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the lack of
reliable sources. There are some sources at a better link, here, but they aren't of the depth that would allow Shoe City to pass the notability guidelines. Cunard (talk) 21:28, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.