Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shone Hyatt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:57, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shone Hyatt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet any of the criteria on

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted

to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:48, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I agree with nom about the poor quality of sources. There are no actual signs that the subject fulfills any of the criteria which would qualify him for a WP article. Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 08:56, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - lacks sufficient
  WP:GNG. Happy Editing! — 71.166.154.41 (talk · contribs) _{20:13, 31 August 2011 (UTC)}[reply
  ]
  • Comment - although the article's creator,
    WP:SPA known as Goldenboy007 (talk · contribs). — 72.75.54.231 (talk) 17:27, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply
    ]
• Delete – I checked a library database of newspaper and magazine articles, but was not able to find anything to help support
  WP:N notability of this musician. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 04:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.