Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shoppingpak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:11, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shoppingpak

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete and Salt please as this has been deleted twice as A7 and this is basically what this current article is, along with G11, and there's absolutely nothing to suggest actual notability and substance with my own searches unsurprisingly finding anything. The blatant persistence shows this is clearly motivated PR advertising and there's presumably other secretive company-involved things than meets the eye (one is that it's the same account involved each and every time). SwisterTwister talk 06:31, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An unreferenced
WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 07:39, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy delete per
WP:A7, and salt. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:07, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:17, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:17, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Source searches are providing no significant coverage in reliable sources at this time. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:39, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.