Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Showroom of Compassion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Showroom of Compassion

Showroom of Compassion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• keep Not
  Yoenit (talk) 13:01, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep. Sure, it might be slightly premature, but I haven't even done any extensive searching, and I've still found several articles online regarding this upcoming album, including here and here. DeadpoolRP (talk) 13:13, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:47, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. This is an album by Cake (band) that's set for release in early 2011. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:47, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, the first song "Sick Of You" has charted, look here: http://www.billboard.com/column/chartbeat#/column/chartbeat/chart-highlights-dance-club-play-alternative-1004118866.story GD1223 (talk) 16:57, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, the first single has charted, the tracklisting has been released, the cover art has been released, and it is set for release in 2011. Totally not
  wp:crystal.--Gen. Quon (talk) 01:06, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• keep album is available for pre-sale 134.76.223.1 (talk) 18:11, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep - This nomination is an incorrect use of
  WP:CRYSTAL seeks to prevent. With that being said, I'm not sure if the third party notice of the album is strong enough yet to make this article viable. But the nominator is responsible for using a rationale that makes sense. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:38, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.