Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shrieker (Fictional Worm Type)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per CSD:R3, it is on the

Shrieker (Fictional Worm Type)

Shrieker (Fictional Worm Type) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Tremors cruft. Probably does not merit its own article. If kept, the animal infobox definitely needs to go — I doubt that's appropriate for fictional creatures — and the article needs a name change, but I'm sure this will wind up deleted anyway. tgies (talk) 18:25, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Keep A violation of Halt to activities. Colonel Warden (talk) 10:29, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - I don't think a species of fictional animal from a television show and a television show character are quite the same. tgies (talk) 00:02, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I disagree that this constitutes a "fictional character" as contemplated by the injunction and agree with the nominator that the article should go.
  talk) 22:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. The characters/episodes injunction does not apply because this is not a television character. Note that the article was already speedied once, and that the author removed the current AfD notice. Powers ^T 00:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this is a monster in a film, and the Arbcom applies only to TV. Blast Ulna (talk) 08:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - It was in the movies, but it was also a party of the Tremors (TV series) which was a spin off from the movies. Ank329 (talk) 15:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect - going off my previous comment, the TV show has an article with more details in it. So, I suggest the current article be redirected to
  Graboid#Shrieker Ank329 (talk) 16:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• No one is ever going to type in "Shrieker (Fictional Worm Type)" as a search term so this has no value as a redirect.
  talk) 01:35, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Redirect (has been done) - I have redirected the article to the film the creature is from. This discussion is as good as closed, now. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 00:26, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.