Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shweta Kumar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Shweta Kumar

Shweta Kumar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources hence falls short of gng & also does not satisfy

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:05, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:05, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:05, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:05, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

'KEEP' This subject have added enough notable references, yes it definitely lack of content as its not traceable till now and whatever content have cant be put, as it may looklike 'Advert', the references added as per WP:ICTFSOURCES. Still if it dosen't met with Wiki Guidelines you may delete it. But as It passed WP:ICTFSOURCES I vote KEEP. Krishna Murthy DL (talk) 03:33, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment — striking out !vote from confirmed sockpuppet. Celestina007 (talk) 11:08, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete does not meet the multiple significant roles in notable productions threshold for notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:05, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep article have significant coverage in media. इं. हेमंत बोरकर (talk) 14:11, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment — striking out !vote from confirmed sockpuppet. Celestina007 (talk) 11:08, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Fails
  WP:NACTOR. Abishe (talk) 19:22, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per nom. --SalmanZ (talk) 17:08, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.