Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shyla Stylez (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

(non-admin closure) Sulfurboy (talk) 08:36, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Shyla Stylez

Shyla Stylez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BIO1E: Besides the Orange County Weekly article about a local political scandal, the only mainstream news coverage Ms. Stylez received was in relation to her untimely death. Tragic and untimely deaths, while tremendously unfortunate, usually do not make the victim notable. Cheers, gnu57 20:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. gnu57 20:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. gnu57 20:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. gnu57 20:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. gnu57 20:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:00, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:34, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can we have source analysis please
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spartaz Humbug! 07:53, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.