Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siebe Snip
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy deleted as a hoax
talk) 19:21, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
Siebe Snip
- Siebe Snip (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unverifiable/possible hoax. No references, Google search doesn't return anything relevant either. (Originally
proposed for deletion by me, deletion tag was endorsed by Reconsider the static (talk · contribs), but removed by an unregistered user - probably the article's creator.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 12:26, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
- Delete per nom.-Reconsider | speak 12:29, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: the article's creator is blocked at Dutch Wikipedia, reportedly for creation of the same article and sockpuppet abuse. (Can somebody confirm this? I don't speak Dutch.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:13, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Dear Mike, i did use the Dutch Wikipedia but under another account name and i have not created a Siebe Snip article there. Also why is the Siebe Snip article open for deletion? Also i didn't touch my article other than making some small edits i did not remove your banners. --Alientools (talk) 17:40, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, what a remarkable coincidence that you have chosen to use exactly the same username as a user on Dutch Wikipedia who created an article with exactly the same title. That really is the most amazing innocent coincidence I've seen for quite some time. The coincidence is even more remarkable for the fact that you tell us you too have edited Dutch Wikipedia. The completely different user with the same username as you has been indefinitely blocked from Dutch Wikipedia for longterm vandalism, and, if I have correctly deciphered the Dutch, has also been found to have been involved in sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry (I am doubtful enough about the Dutch to be unsure which). The article "Siebe Snip" has been repeatedly deleted from Dutch Wikipedia as vandalism. Perhaps you can tell us what your username on Dutch Wikipedia is, since you tell us it is not "Alientools". talk) 19:06, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, what a remarkable coincidence that you have chosen to use exactly the same username as a user on Dutch Wikipedia who created an article with exactly the same title. That really is the most amazing innocent coincidence I've seen for quite some time. The coincidence is even more remarkable for the fact that you tell us you too have edited Dutch Wikipedia. The completely different user with the same username as you has been indefinitely blocked from Dutch Wikipedia for longterm vandalism, and, if I have correctly deciphered the Dutch, has also been found to have been involved in sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry (I am doubtful enough about the Dutch to be unsure which). The article "Siebe Snip" has been repeatedly deleted from Dutch Wikipedia as vandalism. Perhaps you can tell us what your username on Dutch Wikipedia is, since you tell us it is not "Alientools".
- Speedy delete as a hoax. There are no sources about this person. Google-search results are posts by this person. Armbrust Talk Contribs 18:45, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Given the circumstances, I agree; I am marking the page for speedy deletion. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 18:51, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.