Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sim Brick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unanimity that this article fails notability guidelines. Just Chilling (talk) 00:18, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sim Brick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a minor parody that was published in a single issue of a magazine. The only source since the article was created is primary. Dgpop (talk) 23:35, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No independent sources have been provided. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 00:13, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk) 02:35, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete this would need good sourcing to keep.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:00, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. As article stands, it just doesn't seem to pass
  WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 00:52, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete a 25-year-old joke with no source other than the magazine it was published in.
  π, ν) 00:19, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete, doesn't meet
  (talk) 13:27, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.