Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sine from Above (Lady Gaga and Elton John song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Juliette Han (talk) 17:58, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sine from Above (Lady Gaga and Elton John song)

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

• Keep The article is literally 1 day old. The current sources are what they are, but a quick search revealed many, many articles that focus only on this song, including one from Rolling Stone, which is probably as top-tier a source as you can get when it comes to music notability. JimKaatFan (talk) 16:18, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:02, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - The Out.com, NME and Rolling Stone articles currently in the article are specifically about this song, not the album. And the first page of my Google search reveals other sources specifically about the song such as [1] and [2]. Rlendog (talk) 15:21, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• merge and redirect to Chromatica, its been prematurely created and should exist as part of the Chromatica album page unless it gains further notability e.g. charting. Where the information could be included elsehwere, there is no need for its own page. ≫ (Lil-Unique1) -{ Talk }- 16:34, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Yes, the song was just released - however; it has had independent coverage due to the significance of having Sir Elton John on her album and their personal relationship. This is bound to have even more coverage in the future and it is best to have a place to put it. HesioneHushabye (talk)
• Keep: It's clear from the coverage cited in the article that the song is getting news coverage on its own, because of the Elton/Gaga collaboration. The Harper's Bazaar article is called "Lady Gaga and Elton John Dance the Pain Away with 'Sine from Above'", and the Rolling Stone article is "Song You Need to Know: Lady Gaga feat. Elton John, ‘Sine From Above’". Obvious keep. — Toughpigs (talk) 20:18, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: A lot of independent coverage for the song, including the ones indicated above. Article easily passes
  WP:NSONG. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 06:36, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep Notable album track due to its feature with Elton. Nahnah4 (talk | contribs) 07:38, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as shown with links provided above, there are multiple articles specifically focusing on this track that aren't just album reviews or artist/label/producer/songwriter commentary, so this meets WP:NSONGS. Charts (or lack thereof) are irrelevant to whether songs warrant articles. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:29, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: The song has received independent coverage outside of album reviews. Toughpigs has already provided evidence of this. I believe the coverage is significant enough to make the song notable enough for its own article.
  Aoba47 (talk) 03:34, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Can we speedy close this as it's a landslide keep? ≫ (Lil-Unique1) -{ Talk }- 19:26, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.