Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sissy
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 22:19, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
sissy
A dicdef, and nothing more. Voortle 19:13, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This is quite notable. It's not a good article, but it doesn't deserve to be deleted. Sparsefarce 19:34, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep The article is pretty anemic, but it has potential, I think. Serpent-A 20:00, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It's already more than a dicdef, and according to the Sissyphobia article, there's a whole book about it. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:26, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notes on various usages and societal contexts take it beyond a dictdef. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:39, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep, now that I've merged the sissyphobia article into this article, making the sissy article sound more encyclopedic. Voortle 21:10, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete - my concern is consistency in application of rules. Sissyphobia was not ideal. "Sissyphopia" as a topic avoids usage issues that impinge on "sissy". I had previously reverted the redirect before seeing Voortle's comment here. I'm going to just save my comment now and wait for things to settle. ENeville 21:45, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep valid stub. SchmuckyTheCat 07:10, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep stub not a dicdef.--Nilfanion (talk) 21:10, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- "keep" the term, all kind of expressions should be consider in a really inclusive dictionary — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.241.82.33 (talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.