Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SiteWorks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the company does not meet Wikipedia's notability standards. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:57, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SiteWorks

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:NCORP Vexations (talk) 17:38, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:21, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:21, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 14:15, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - fails
WP:RS mentions, including from large organizations they contracted for. --HunterM267 ^talk 17:25, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Fails
WP:NCORP Snowycats (talk) 04:31, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Agree with above, topic fails GNG and
HighKing⁺⁺ 13:32, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.