Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smyčka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – Joe (talk) 20:43, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Smyčka

Smyčka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Crappy bot article that doesn't meet

Shadowowl, how did you come to the conclusion that this topic doesn't meet WP:NBOOK nor WP:GNG? --Oakshade (talk) 01:10, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:42, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - In just a few seconds I found a ton of in-depth coverage has been written about this book from the like of
  WP:GNG. Being a stub is not a reason to delete. --Oakshade (talk) 01:10, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep per Oakshade. Satisfies GNG and NBOOK. James500 (talk) 06:31, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge Readers would be better served by having the article redirect to the author's page. As it stands, the article is a content fork with absolutely no content about the book. Also, there is no referenced used in the article. --
  ping me if you had replied 10:38, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]