Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snooze Ya Looze

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Isaac Air Freight. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 21:37, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Snooze Ya Looze

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This album lacks substantial RS coverage. Tagged for zero refs for 3 years, without improvement. Epeefleche (talk) 01:12, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~weak keep~~ merge/redirect The album also lacks any coverage in the wikipedia article beyond basic discogs info, so refs are not an issue here. May be merged into the author's page, but just as well kept separately, since
wikipedia is not paper. Lom Konkreta (talk) 02:53, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

I'm not sure on what basis you are suggesting this could be a keep, even a weak one, given that it has zero refs and you have not indicated any substantial, multiple RS coverage. It fails to meet our notability and verifiability policies. Tx.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:07, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Vote clanged, for clarity. Lom Konkreta (talk) 02:15, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks. I have no problem with a redirect. I don't see a merge as making sense, as all the text is uncited and challenged, and requires inline citations per
    wp:CHALLENGED.--Epeefleche (talk) 08:22, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    - Well, you don't have to merge everything. And a diligent merge would include finding some sources. If the album really existed, I am sure to find refs for track listing should not be a big challenge. Lom Konkreta (talk) 17:21, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      - One could always, after a redirect (or even now), create appropriate text (supported by refs) at the target article. A merge involves more (otherwise unnecessary) work, on the part of the editor proposing the merge -- it is he, not the closer, who must then reflect all edit history of the merging article into that of the target article, for copyvio purposes.--Epeefleche (talk) 08:06, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.