Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social preference optimization

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 17:35, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Social preference optimization

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(This article was proposed for deletion, but that was contested by the page creator.) The article describes a neologism that has not seen use outside of a single source, which appears to be related to whoever coined the term. In addition, there is a significant POV issue, and the article would require significant rewrite to be encyclopedic. wctaiwan (talk) 16:03, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 19:49, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete Ad style article for Dennis Stemmle. Topic is covered in Social search and Social media optimization MadCow257 (talk) 01:32, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 19:28, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

strong delete not only is it an imaginary and NN subject and an advert for dennis stemmle, but it's full of paraphrase and copyvio from the dude's website. the duplicate detector tells us. Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 02:17, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

comment oh my. have a look at this: http://www.articles<remove>base.com/find-articles.php?q=cherryl+lewis (i can't post the url articles base dot com because of spam filter) and this: [1], and, of course, then the history. — Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 04:15, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.