Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sofya Skya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There is no consensus on the question of notability. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 09:18, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sofya Skya

Sofya Skya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability guidelines. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 03:40, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 03:40, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 03:40, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 03:40, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 03:40, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:52, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:53, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:53, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Why not keep? She won Mrs. World in 2006, is covered for years for her relationship with Sergey Veremeenko for example [1]. She has coverage for acting: [2]. Must be even more coverage in Russian.--KasiaNL (talk) 07:11, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep film list looks notable to me. - Chris.sherlock (talk) 16:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I am unconvinced any of her roles were in actual notable productions. Not every film that is commercially released is actually notable. Wikipedia has a lot of articles on films that are not notable, and at least one of her roles seems to have been in such a film.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:33, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as meeting
  WP:NACTOR criterion 1, and per KasiaNL's point. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:38, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Comment: I'm a bit perplexed by those saying her filmography is notable. Only 2 of the 15 films listed even have their own Wikipedia pages, and her only other credit is a one-off CSI:NY episode. The article seems to be written as a self-promotion, with claims that she is a Hollywood actress, and I cannot find sources for her career as a ballerina being notable either. Coverage of her relationship with Sergey Veremeenko seems irrelevant as being the GF/wife of someone notable does not merit her own Wikipedia article. 5 of the 9 sources used in her entire article are YouTube videos, with the other 4 sources being websites which are also not relevant enough for their own Wikipedia pages (mainlinemedianews.com, martialartsentertainment.com, btvnovinite.bg, meetforcharity.today). How is she notable? Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 23:43, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I think the answer to
  talk) 00:05, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

That was exactly my point though. What significant role has she had in a notable project? The Christian Slater film is not even notable enough for its own Wiki page, so that's not one. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 13:08, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Only The Tomb seems to be a notable film with her having a significant role. However is that really a notable film? We have one other article on a film she appeared in, but she was not in as significant a role there. We really in most cases should interpret multiple as 3 or more, which she clearly does not have as of yet.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:26, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as meets
  Talk: Contribs) 12:44, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Weak Keep: I think this is a borderline case: the subject has had a lot of main roles in films, but only some of the films are moderately notable; the Mainline source (a media outlet I'm not familiar with) is quite in-depth, but there doesn't seem to be much more significant coverage available (in English sources, anyway). All in all, though, I think there is enough for a weak
  WP:GNG argument—so I'd let the article stand. Dflaw4 (talk) 10:03, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.