Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soilon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Tea bag#Production. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Soilon

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN product - fails

WP:GNG UtherSRG (talk) 19:23, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Products, Environment, and Technology. UtherSRG (talk) 19:23, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Seems to be used in tea bags [1] with a dozen or so UK sources mentioning it. Could probably use a rewrite, I think we have something here... Oaktree b (talk) 15:04, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:24, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to
Tea bags#Production where Soilon is mentioned and there is content on the various materials used in teabag manufacture. Rupples (talk) 23:52, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see whether editors would argue for an article deletion, rewrite or redirect to Tea bag#Production.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:38, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect at least, and perhaps merge the two cited paragraphs there as a single paragraph. Seems to have some encyclopedic significance even if lacking quite enough material to build an article out of. ~~(Notwithstanding the current opening sentence, "soilon" seems to be largely genericized in English, which also suggests a certain level of encyclopedicity.)~~ -- Visviva (talk) 01:38, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Its an ideal redirect target as its already mentioned in the destination with an almost identical description. scope_creep^Talk 06:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.