Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophia Santi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 03:43, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sophia Santi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A vanity page on an unremarkable actress that does not meet BIO or

WP:PSEUDO biography with intricate detail such as "her father is Romanian, with Gypsy and Mongolian ancestry" and "she got a very large tattoo of a Japanese dragon at age 18". Awards listed are scene-related and not significant and well known. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:13, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:13, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:13, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as clearly not satisfying the applicable notability and there's literally nothing else actually meaningful substantial for a convincing article. SwisterTwister talk 06:24, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 18:52, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete per Swister Twister. Montanabw^(talk) 07:05, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:57, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lacks coverage by independent reliable sources. Porn trade press coverage consists of republished press releases and passing mentions. Fails GNG and scene-related award wins don't satisfy PORNBIO. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.