Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soraya Serajeddini

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Part of a passel of questionable-at-best-faith noms by a now-indef'd editor. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:52, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Soraya Serajeddini

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a vanity article of a non notable nationalist. I cannot even find anything on Google news. Does not meet GNG. Hassan Rebell (talk) 19:48, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I found a source mentioning her, but she only comes up in passing.[1] Doesn't seem to be enough coverage to pass GNG. Brustopher (talk) 02:23, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Nom has been indeffed per
YO 😜 22:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Let run a little longer We might want to let this discussion run a little longer than normal as the nom did not notify the article's creator (Vekoler) of its nomination . I have just now notified Vekoler. --Bejnar (talk) 22:51, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The original references in external links have now been restored from archive data. The IP editor (Special:Contributions/81.62.246.169) who marked them dead failed to check the archives as suggest in the usage section of the {{Dead link}} template. --Bejnar (talk) 23:19, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.