Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Parkway/Beaver Island Parkway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge into Beaver Island State Park. Bearian (talk) 16:14, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

South Parkway/Beaver Island Parkway

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log

)

• Merge to Beaver Island State Park. Reference routes are not notable by default and, as the nominator outlined, this one can be adequately covered in the article about the park. --TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 19:47, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Random reference routes generally aren't notable. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 20:29, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to the park. Routes assigned numbers by the state should be mentioned somewhere, and there's enough to say that it shouldn't redirect to the list of reference routes. --NE2 06:42, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Locobot (talk) 01:14, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to the park. Not being notable enough for an independent article in no way means that it's not notable enough to be mentioned somewhere in Wikipedia. Bearcat (talk) 22:01, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Beaver Island State Park, as suggested by most others already, unless someone brings here some compelling evidence of notability. Dicklyon (talk) 22:06, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.