Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spirit Lost

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Nomination withdrawn with no remaining deletion proposals.

(non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 00:56, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Spirit Lost

Spirit Lost (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails

WP:NEXIST. The Film Creator (talk) 17:48, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Redirect to Nancy Thayer - No clue why the current source for 1944 movie is in article, but in Thayer's article I found a mention of a source that mentions the book being adapted to this movie (Contemporary authors. Volume 155 p.400). There is more on next page about the book and it mentions and quotes specifically a review of book in Kirkus Reviews [1]. If we can find more reliable sources, could perhaps be an article for both the book and/or movie. Noticed the two book sources added as I was writing this, but as mention same author. WikiVirusC(talk) 18:26, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Noticed a review in Neema Barnette's article, from Indianapolis Recorder - "`Spirit Lost' a low-down psychological thriller" June 10, 1995[2]. Saw other articles that mention film, mostly in context of Tim Reid producing it, a fact which never seemed to make into this or his article. A few described it as erotic film although these were before or while it was in production.[3] Without additional reviews I'll still lean redirect. WikiVirusC(talk) 19:26, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - With the additional sources and reviews found by Cunard, I will switch over from redirect. WikiVirusC(talk) 12:45, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Sources added to the page or mentioned above by ReaderofthePack and WikiVirusC attest a certain notability.— MY, OH, MY! 08:44, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.