Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Split infinitive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was to speedily keep the article ~ trialsanderrors 02:45, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Split infinitive

Having an adverb within an infinitive verb is completely normal, so this article doesn't make any sense. There is really no point in this article existing.--Renowned linguist 02:10, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep Umm...yeah.
  WP:SNOW? Gzkn 02:21, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Strong keep Perfectly reasonable topic and article. Not sure what the rationale is or why this has been nominated. Akihabara 02:24, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep and close. No valid reason for deletion given. There are a lot of things that are quite common that have articles; Hydrogen anyone? wtfunkymonkey 02:35, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.