Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sport utility coupe (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 15:09, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sport utility coupe

Sport utility coupe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log

)

• Delete. Article is completely original and includes speculation (see descriptions for S-10 Blazer, Dodge Ramcharger, and this former description of the K5 Blazer which I removed).--
  talk) 23:10, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Delete I agree with the nominator's assessment, but think that OR and no refs go hand in hand. ThuranX (talk) 00:41, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong delete per nom and SALT ukexpat (talk) 03:39, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per
  WP:OR Who decides what is a 'sport utility coupe'? Artene50 (talk) 05:12, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete—as OR. I did find some manufacturer mentions of the term, but for now it's more
  neologism and marketing-babble than an actual, defined term. When IIHS or even Car&Driver/R&T/Autoweek start using the term to define a class of cars then this article can be revisited. Livitup (talk) 15:04, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep. Some 2-door SUVs are interesting to know about. --Roadstaa (talk) 05:27, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It seems though, there is no

reliable support that these are widely called Sport utility coupes. Gwen Gale (talk) 06:29, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

If there is no widespread info suggesting that it is a "sport utility coupe"; then maybe a redirect to the

sport utility vehicle article would be recommended. Or maybe make a more major article to encompass this concept without using this term. --Roadstaa (talk) 02:49, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete Other than per …., is it looks like a car that can be in an encyclopedia--Puttyschool (talk) 02:10, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.