Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St James the Apostle Primary School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Hoppers Crossing, Victoria. MBisanz ^talk 00:21, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

St James the Apostle Primary School

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. primary schools are not inherently notable. could not find significant coverage of this. LibStar (talk) 04:41, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

czar · · 04:44, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:29, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Schools are kept regardless!. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 19:14, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

primary schools are not inherently notable, only high schools are. LibStar (talk) 06:15, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've been told any school is notable, Whether it's primary, secondary/high or special. -

→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 11:34, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's not correct - please see

WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES Nick-D (talk) 11:58, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks, Much appreciated!, →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 12:06, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Merge - Given that there is no proof of notability on the page (the only source cited is the school's website), and since no source is forthcoming following a Google search, I can't see a reason to maintain it. I know that primary schools are typically merged with the school district if they do not meet the normal criteria for an organization to be notable, so it may be possible to merge this in some way with the article for the
Archdiocese of Melbourne. Given the current content of that article, though, that doesn't seem possible. Chri$topher (talk) 23:14, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete No indications of
WP:ORG being met. Nick-D (talk) 11:56, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Redirect to Hoppers Crossing, Victoria. Merge is not appropriate as the article is unsourced. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 23:15, 24 April 2013 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.