Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacey Jordan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:26, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stacey Jordan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable mayor and briefly a county freeholder. Fails

Rusf10 (talk) 03:25, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:08, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:08, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not independently notable from her political position. SportingFlyer (talk) 07:16, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:48, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Her designation as the first woman to hold her title as Mayor of the town is notable, especially when combined with other political roles. However, I would add further citation to show wide media coverage of those items that make her notable. Fyathyrio (talk) 10:14, 26 February 2018 (UTC)— Fyathyrio (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

She is the first female mayor of Moorestown, not first female mayor in the United States (or even New Jersey). Her gender does not give her notability, otherwise we would need an article about the first female mayor in every town everywhere.--

Rusf10 (talk) 16:54, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Being the first woman mayor of her own small town is not an automatic notability boost over and above every other mayor of the same town — every place that has mayors at all will always eventually have its own first woman mayor, so being female can't automatically make every last one of those women a special case. If it had made her the first woman mayor in the entire United States, then that would be a valid notability claim — but merely being the first woman mayor of her own small town, in a country that already had thousands of women mayors before her, is not an automatic inclusion freebie. Bearcat (talk) 17:00, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. None of her roles are inherently notable enough to grant her an automatic
WP:GNG in lieu. Bearcat (talk) 17:00, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 23:11, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete All coverage is from local media, and I would agree that at being elected in the 21st century as the first woman in any position is no longer a source of notability. Mangoe (talk) 18:35, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Current local media coverage is insufficient to meet
geberal notability guidelines. DaveApter (talk) 14:54, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.