Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanford Memorial Church

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep ~ trialsanderrors 10:33, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stanford Memorial Church

Stanford Memorial Church (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Non-verifiable as per WP:CHURCH, and also non-notable, and doesn't have any historical significance. Adam Riley ^Talk 17:54, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Notable because of the connection to two SF Bay area earthquakes. They've also recently added another pipe organ which has the unusual ability to play in either equal or just temperament. (I'll look for a cite for that claim.) -- Bpmullins | Talk 21:48, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Bpmullins. WP:CHURCH is really not appropriate, as it is only a proposed guideline and is nowhere near consensus. If a proposed guideline were to apply, I'd say that this church meets
  WP:LOCAL at the very least. The article provides an indication that this isn't a typical neighbourhood parish church and why it has some notability and encyclopedic value. Agent 86 23:40, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep. The building is architecturally significant, and was thoroughly documented in the Historic American Building Survey (HABS) conducted by the US Library of Congress. Daderot 21:37, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.