Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanley Farlow

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:58, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stanley Farlow

Stanley Farlow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing any notability. Slatersteven (talk) 16:52, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 17:06, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 17:06, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 17:06, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I am not convinced the 1000-citation count for his book on PDE is valid (there is another book with the same title that Google Scholar might be confusing it with) but I think the five published reviews for two of his books that I just added to the article are enough for
    WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:24, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Not seeing how he passes author, reviews do not seem to be mentioned. He may pass widely cited, but as you say it may not be him.Slatersteven (talk) 08:03, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The reviews are definitely him and are definitely cited as sources in the current version of the article. There is no rule (and should be no rule) that we talk about the reviews in the text of the article. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:41, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.