Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanley Leisure

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 00:48, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stanley Leisure

Stanley Leisure (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks any notability/importance to have its own article. Kolma8 (talk) 10:47, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:50, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:50, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:13, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the quotations methioned above are mere listings, that at most prove size, not substantial sources as needed to show notability . DGG ( talk ) 10:35, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Encyclopedia.com entry for Stanley Leisure is over 2,000 words long. That source by itself strongly establishes notability since a company with a 2,000-word encyclopedia entry will be covered by numerous other sources such as those I've listed. There are also numerous articles about Stanley Leisure in The Times, The Independent, and the Financial Times.

    Cunard (talk) 11:41, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep it was never out of the financial press in the 80's + early 90's. --Devokewater (talk) 19:16, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.