Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Monaco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.

SOFTDELETE per low participation herein. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:56, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Stephen Monaco

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite having 46 citations, I have not found any that are actually acceptable/verify notability. Sources include press releases, brief mentions/quotes as a spokesperson, primary sources and misc low quality cites. CorporateM (Talk) 18:38, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Highly promotional and no in-depth sources that I can find. There are mentions in business articles, but none of the articles are about him. Two of the sources that I looked at (the Infoworld ones) did not have his name, but a similar name ("Richard Monaco") -- the links are to searches that find a nearest match. #23 does not mention him. Lots of blog posts and other non-RS sources listed. Created and heavily edited by an SPA in 2011, plus evidence of SPA's more recent.
WP:PROMO LaMona (talk) 23:22, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 00:29, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:13, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Seems highly promotional. No opinion as to notability. Carrite (talk) 19:07, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.