Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Todd (editor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 20:09, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Todd (editor)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient notability for

WP:Author; he's written some stuff and edited some stuff, which is what journalists and editors do, but not attracted much attention from his peers. Article created and maintained by COI editor, most of the sources either primary or completely spurious. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:07, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:BIO. reliability of sources is questionable. LibStar (talk) 01:28, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Stephen Todd was the launch editor of Numéro.50.9.165.84 (talk) 03:00, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: please see

WP:Coin#Fashion Net for discussion of 50.9.165.84 in relation to this and other articles created and maintained by confirmed COI editor Shousokutsuu. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:41, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:19, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - regardless of which publications the subject has written for, he isn't proven to meet any of the four criteria of
WP:AUTHOR. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 04:30, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.