Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stereolizza
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Spartaz Humbug! 19:28, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
]
Stereolizza
- Stereolizza (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There are no reliable secondary sources about the subject in the article. I couldn't find anything substantial either. Many editors seem to SPAs and the reference section appears to be a case of
]- Note: This discussion has been included in the talk • mail) 04:08, 16 May 2018 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the talk • mail) 04:08, 16 May 2018 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the talk • mail) 04:08, 16 May 2018 (UTC)]
- Keep. Wikitigresito I think it probably squeaks by WP:GNG, mostly for the unique and very searchable name. But absolutely no justification for the huge page and 46 references. Someone needs to cut all that out. change it to 2 lines about their music and ethnic heritage. ChalkDrawings33 (talk) 06:45, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- @talk • mail) 06:48, 16 May 2018 (UTC)]
- Yea, sorry. Krishna Chaitanya Velaga. My mistake ChalkDrawings33 (talk) 07:08, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- On-Topic: Could you point me to the sources that make this group pass WP:GNG? wikitigresito (talk) 20:06, 16 May 2018 (UTC)]
- Comment Krishna Chaitanya Velaga Wikitigresito thank you for your input. I've considerably condensed the article, cleaned up for neutrality, as well as removed all bad references. Hope this helps. Cheers!Sashagb2017 (talk) 18:01, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: I'm not sure why having a unique name would make this pass WP:GNG, but it doesn't appear to pass, and it doesn't pass WP:BADCHARTS), links to user-generated content from iMDb and the like to prove the band's songs have appeared in TV shows (no big deal, almost every band in the world has had their music used as TV background music at some point or other), links to the band's website, record company and Amazon to prove you can buy their records, and awards won at a non-notable and dubious award ceremony (you have to pay to enter your video). Just about the best RS I can find is this passing mention in an article in The Guardian, but it doesn't tell you anything about the band at all. Richard3120 (talk) 00:47, 22 May 2018 (UTC)]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 17:03, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 17:03, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, A Traintalk 07:55, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, A Traintalk 07:55, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.