Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sterling's Infantry Company

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Delaware Civil War units. Content can be merged from history. Sandstein 19:48, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sterling's Infantry Company

Sterling's Infantry Company (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I hate to do this, because I'm very much interested in the American Civil War, but I'm not seeing how this is notable.

WP:GNG. I'm thinking that the best choice is to redirect to List of Delaware Civil War units, but as I can see this being controversial, I'm taking it here. Hog Farm Bacon 16:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 16:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 16:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to List of Delaware Civil War units. Fails MILUNIT due to size, and while there are a few exceptions to the idea that sub-units aren't notable, like ACW artillery batteries, they generally played an important role in multiple major battles. This particular company doesn't appear to have done anything notable except guard a railway line for under a year. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect per nom. Reasonable exception to our usual rule about independent sub-units. Buckshot06 (talk) 08:52, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge with List of Delaware Civil War units: I don't think it's independently notable, but we might as well keep the little information present at the target article. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:49, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.