Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Jon Halasz
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Soft delete. LFaraone 00:20, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Steven Jon Halasz
- Steven Jon Halasz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This person is really not notable. He published one novel, which as far as I can tell is not notable, he wrote some short stories and some poems and a few others things. Plus the article really does not have any sources. What it has is not really varrified, and it is unclear if the stuff was varrified that he would count as notable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:56, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment He appears to have done some computer science related papers, but they do not look to be widely cited, so I think he fails the guidelines for an academic, and really do not see how his one novel would make him a notable novelists.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:02, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I noticed that there are NO references in this article. Someone has to find a reference otherwise it is most likely to be deleted. Ashbeckjonathan 00:03, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 15:22, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.