Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stevie Cochran

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:57, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stevie Cochran

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete.

primary variety. As always, Wikipedia is not a free PR platform where musicians get to start articles about themselves just because they exist; RS coverage must explicitly verify passage of one or more specific NMUSIC criteria, but nothing here satisfies either of those conditions. Bearcat (talk) 00:43, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 21:36, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete Fails

~~WP:GNG. John Jaffar Janardan (talk) 04:03, 22 August 2016 (UTC)~~ striking confirmed sockpuppet Atlantic306 (talk) 03:36, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete Promotional page for a non-notable musician. No mentions on any websites that aren't user-submitted content. ArchieOof (talk) 11:56, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I can't find good sources even for a basic article. Blythwood (talk) 22:58, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:28, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Poorly sourced. ShelbyMarion (talk) 16:37, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.