Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stevie Nelson

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 23:50, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stevie Nelson

Stevie Nelson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not eligible for a speedy due to presence of plausible claims of notability. Probably fails

WP:GNG as a cursory search does not turn up any editorial coverage -- just presence in lists of credits and the like. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 19:02, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:18, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:18, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:22, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:22, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I can't find any sources to show that she passes
    WP:NACTOR or any more generic notability criteria. She's had a few guest roles (don't know how significant) in TV shows, and two years hosting a sports failure video clip show. That's it. The only source in the article is a very weak IMDB blurb. Meters (talk) 00:08, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Help! 01:15, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.