Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stonebank
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 08:44, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Stonebank
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Never charted. Only significant coverage currently on the article is an interview related to the software this artist uses. Never released for a major record label; Monstercat is considered an independent label in this subject area. Fails
WP:MUSICBIO. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:40, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:40, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:40, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Has only 10 references, most of which from the same few websites. Googling site:billboard.com "Stonebank" does seem to prove he did chart, but going into the actual pages don't show anything. Until it can be proven that he did, the article fails WP:MUSICBIO. 06:15, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.