Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stop Playing: Reloaded (Mixtape)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:56, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Playing: Reloaded (Mixtape)

Stop Playing: Reloaded (Mixtape) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, unsourced Internet-only mixtape. Tagged for PROD but page creator removed. (ESkog)^(Talk) 19:08, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per
  WP:MUSIC Qworty (talk) 19:57, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 21:15, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per
  WP:NALBUM. I quote: "Demos, mixtapes, bootlegs, promo-only, and unreleased albums are in general not notable; however, they may be notable if they have significant independent coverage in reliable sources." There do not appear to be any sources rebutting this presumption of non-notability. - DustFormsWords (talk) 06:33, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Comment - I'd note that this article was proposed for deletion only two minutes after the article creator was blocked for repeated uploading of copyrighted images. And while I still stand by my Delete vote for the reasons above, I'd just say it's not the most generously-timed deletion nomination given that the creator will not have an opportunity to improve the article or comment in this AfD. If the page is deleted I would strongly recommend the closing admin userfy it to DJ Lil' Shock's user space to allow him to improve it if and when he returns from the block. - DustFormsWords (talk) 06:37, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The block was only for 31 hours; it expired two days ago. (ESkog)^(Talk) 12:40, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for now. If the blocked user is looking to make it sourced, show notability, and all of that I suppose we can cross that path when we get there. JBsupreme (talk) 08:16, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.