Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stu Maddux
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 00:11, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Stu Maddux
- Stu Maddux (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional article, seems a COI. The one independent film he produced *might* be notable, but the sources seem to be talking round him, or in most cases, don't pass WP:RS Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 14:40, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:58, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:58, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep at pushing at enough coverage, we have notability enough for Wikiedia. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 04:17, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There is enough notability for the article.Vincelord (talk) 15:00, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. ]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 20:32, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.