Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suelyn Medeiros (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:13, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Suelyn Medeiros

Suelyn Medeiros (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Once again, we have an article of an un-notable video girl whose first AfD was flawed beyond belief (on top of the fact that the page was recreated after having previously been deleted.). One even had the nerve to say, "We should keep it because when you google her she has a clothing line and autobiography" and... since when is that a logical reason to keep an article? (Consequently, when you google said clothing line–it never came out.) This article has absolutely no career section because there is no career to speak of ("girl in R. Kelly video", "girl in Chris Brown video", "girl in Pharrell video" yada yada yada. Hundreds others have done the same. Uncredited appearance on Law & Order, thousands of entry level actors do it every week.) Besides that, the article is only one sentence. One of the references is, unspeakably, TMZ. And what did they have to offer, you ask? A TRANSCLUSION OF A ONE SENTENCE IMDB BIO THAT ANY RANDOM USER WROTE! Even worse: "Meet Brazilian Bombshell: Model rivals Kim K in bootylicious twerk-out". Yeah... no. Trillfendi (talk) 00:48, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 02:34, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 02:36, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 02:36, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.