Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sulaimani Public Library
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. See comments below by nominator. (non-admin closure) 4meter4 (talk) 19:11, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Sulaimani Public Library
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sulaimani Public Library (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Public library of no notability. Article lacks even the context to place it in Iraq, makes no claim whatsoever of any notability. Building is not notable per WP:NBUILDING; fails WP:GNG. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:42, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Iraq. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:42, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- There are sources. I found these via our friends at wikipedia Sorani. 1 and 2 and 3 and 4 are reasonable length news articles about the library, the book collection and history. The ckb.wiki also cites various offline books about the library. It's a city of nearly 900k people - wouldn't it be more surprising if their public library wasn't notable? In my country there's a fairly major wiki page on libraries in cities that size (and likely some for places a lot smaller). I say keep in solidarity with our Kurdish Sorani WP friends. JMWt (talk) 08:49, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep with the sources given above, I'm good with GNG having been met. They seem like RS. Oaktree b (talk) 13:08, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- Agree & Withdraw nomination. Shame they - and the information they contain - couldn't have been in the article. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:11, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.