Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sultan Choudhury

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Sultan Choudhury

Sultan Choudhury (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

AfD: Nominated for deletion; The person is clearly not notable for this article to remain and is not active in the sector claimed. The tone of the statement released by the company that sacked him recently, raise many concerns and questions, its meaning is very clear in financial services. There is a clear lack of objectivity in the article e.g. Career and Early Life. The quoted sources for such sections are very poor and not independent or known well, as they could be paid for to provide a feature on the person. What is the relation of pilgrimage here, it is a bit dramatic rather than objective facts. Also there is not an independent reliable source about his involvement in advisory groups to government and other organisations. It is very bold claim without a reliable independent proof to support it. This is not in accordance with Wiki's policies. This article should be seriously considered for deletion as it violates various Wiki's criteria. It takes just a few thorough objective and independent checks to conclude that this article should be deleted. Created at 13:43, 30 July 2019‎ by Majidii1234 (contributions)

— Majidii1234 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:05, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:05, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:05, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:05, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:05, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: For what it's worth, the editor who submitted this article to AfD has been indef'd as a sock puppet. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 17:24, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Choudhury is one of the founders and, until recently, the CEO, of Al Rayan Bank, the first Islamic bank to be established outside of the traditionally Muslim countries. This alone is significant enough to merit inclusion. Note that the AFD nomination appears not to have been made in good faith, as the editor who nominated this article made several controversial edits to the article, with equally controversial edit summaries. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:48, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Agree with the above. Not a good faith nomination. Edit summary before virtual blanking of article: "He was sacked as a CEO of Al Rayan Bank due to serious issues, which was clear from the statement released by the bank employed him (see reference No. 1), the bank removed any connection with him anywherand is no longer active or has any notable activities that may give merits for keeping this article. Thus, we strongly recommend deletion of this article." This strongly suggests that the nominator, who is now blocked, is connected to the bank and they want the article removed from WP. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:20, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Clearly not a good faith nomination, more a twisting of the knife. If kept, what appears to be copyvio from the Zakat charity website ought to be dealt with. -Roxy, the dog. wooF 10:07, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.