Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suntlay
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep per
WP:GEOLAND and move to Suntalay Khasmahal. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 17:43, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
]
Suntlay
Recommending deletion as I cannot find any information online to verify the existence of this particular locality. Please note that a deletion was originally proposed via {{
WP:BEFORE this nomination. Please notify me if appropriate sources can be located, as all populated, legally recognized places of any size are generally considered notable. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 17:57, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 19:01, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- Weak keep with rename. India's 2011 Census includes lists of named settlements (although if it includes specific population metrics for each of them, I cannot find them). For this district, that information is here. There's no Suntlay, but there is a small village named NH 31A, which I assume was the intended subject of this article. With that said, reliable online-available English-language sources don't offer much else than that it exists (its mentioned in a few other government sources, and name-checked in a botanical survey), so my keep here is a weak one indeed. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 15:13, 13 August 2015 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.